|
Some Men Just Want To Watch The World Burn
Originally Posted March 10, 2010 Well, someone has to actually say it. Obama is out to destroy America. It has to be obvious to anyone with an IQ above seaweed (which of course disqualifies those with law degrees from Harvard, Columbia and Occidental College as well as most of Congress). This is a man on a mission from god…whoever his god is. It certainly isn’t the God of this nation. The “yes, we can” mantra that drove the “change we need” euphoric high called the Obama 2008 election campaign is wearing off and like the crash and burn after too much dope combined with too much alcohol, dazed voters everywhere are coming out of their quasi-intellectual stupors and asking all too regrettably, “What were we thinking?” Well, the truth is those of you who voted for this clown weren’t thinking. You were actually trying to escape from having to think. You were looking for an easy fix because you have become persuaded that the inalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness that our forefathers penned in our Constitution are entitlements that come solely from being American citizens and not privileges associated with being a creation of God. In a very biblical sense, instead of “tending the garden and keeping it” you have been deceived into believing a paid gardener (especially at someone else’s expense) is a better idea and therefore justified. Obama knows this. He was taught during his adolescence (that immature phase everyone but liberals outgrow) God doesn’t work and learned how to convince you he could do better. Like Satan tempting Jesus, Obama promised you the world if you “only fall down and worship me,” so you voted for this gangster and his cronies because you no longer want (or in the case of the 4th and 5th generation welfare generation never want) to be responsible, much less accountable for your choices. Giving up your individual freedom seems a small price for having everything given to you in exchange. After all, who needs freedom if you have everything you believe defines it? Or if you believe you have never had it to begin with? You took the bait, hook, line and sinker. Problem is, just as Satan’s deception toward Eve in the garden and his promise to Jesus while overlooking the wealth of the world from that high mountaintop, Obama’s freedom is a lie in every sense of the word. Kris Kristofferson once penned the words, “Freedom is just another word for nothing left to lose” in his song “Bobby McGee,” a song made famous by Janis Joplin during the rebellious sixties because, along with many other songs of that era it carried the promise of real freedom, peace and happiness if we just tuned in, turned on and dropped out. A beautiful song with a beautiful intent, sung by a truly beautiful human being. Janis Joplin died just days after recording this song from a drug overdose. In a very prophetic fashion Janis proved that artificially produced happiness, peace and freedom is fleeting. Conservatives know this. Some of us know because we lived the “free life,” free from responsibility and accountability but a slave to the self-destruction it produces. In the long term Obama’s idea of freedom will steal, destroy and kill in much the same fashion. (Warning: College students need to swear off Bruce Springsteen, Bono and Sting like a bad church experience or risk a similar fate). Others of you voted for Obama because of your hatred for George Bush. You believe Bush is the devil because of his ties to Saudi oil, his aristocratic heritage that may or may not have kept him out of Vietnam, his obsession with destroying Saddam Hussein because he threatened his father, his Texas demeanor, his choice of friends (Cheney, Rove, Rumsfeld, Rice, Ashcroft, Gonzales), his crooked smile, his dopey way with the English language (I miss Bushisms if not the man). You were so intent on letting everyone know how much you hated “Dubya” that you actually chose the “…greater of 2 evils” simply out of vindication. Given what we now see today would it have really been that bad if McCain had won…or even Hillary? The worst that could happen with McCain in office is a political stalemate, which is actually what we need in government now instead of letting them try to fix something they actually broke to begin with. If Hillary were there she would be spending her time keeping an eye on the interns in the White House…away from Bill in between heart surgeries. Oh, she might join Al Gore in the climate change fiasco but otherwise she would be harmless. She has already learned the political pitfall of healthcare reform. But you had to let your anger get the better of you. Obama recognized this anger in you because he too knows anger and hatred. But unlike you he has been taught by his Pastor and socialistic mentors how to go beyond vetting and learned to channel his anger and hatred toward an end. Using the false religion of Black Liberation Theology he has convinced a majority of Godless Americans that Jesus and Obama have the same righteous intent in mind, to redistribute wealth and eradicate racial hatred in the world. And he would do it at the expense of the Sadducees and Pharisees of our time, white corporate America, represented of course by the evil George Bush. A simple task actually. As a scapegoat Bush was readily available. He seemed oblivious to what others thought of him which allowed too many in America the time to be conditioned to hate him. Bush was a ready made effigy for Obamania. And you gave him the matches. And like the eternal flame that stands over the grave of JFK, Obama keeps Bush’s effigy burning whenever questioned on the seemingly ineffectiveness and ulterior motives of his administration and policies. All this in such a short span of time. This is another thing Obama knows - the effectiveness of moving fast. He has been taught well by academia that Americans are slow to respond to political strategies because we are too busy working, raising children and watching American Idol. Talk fast and move quickly before someone figures it out, because once the sleeping giant is aroused death is quick and certain. Even as you Obamaniacs realize his party is over and it's time to get up off the floor and go home, Obama, like a designated driver continues to try to get you to trust him, prodding you to quickly get in the car with him, to take yet another shot of his spiked Kool Aid, hoping you stay dazed just long enough for him to drive you to a destination other than where you think you are going. There's a reason Obama is the only one who doesn't drink at his own party. The destination is Obamaland, the land of socialist ideals and order. The land of economic reparation for the culturally challenged, where individualism is irrelevant and therefore surrendered in the name of the common good of all. Utopia complete with everything guaranteed to keep you dumbed down and doped up. Just the way liberals like it. I know the liberals, activists and race-baiters will screech from the highest perch of their padded cells that I am an elitist, racist, ignorant white supremacist who only wants the rich to get richer, the poor to get poorer, the unsaved to convert to Judeo Christianity and George Bush to become our king. To that I say, “Whatever blows your skirt up”. That doesn’t change the fact Obama wants to destroy America. And that you who voted for him did it out of your own selfishness, ignorance and/or disregard. You gave him license. You bought the scam. “And what proof do you have, you racist moron, you doomsayer, that what Obama wants to change is not for the better, that his motives nothing but honorable, his methods nothing short of ingenious?” I hear the self proclaimed intellectuals ask smugly as they polish their Obama idols. “To what end and for what reason would Obama want to destroy America?” Well, to answer that simply take a look at his actions. Change Rather Than Reform – In the preamble of the Declaration of Independence the authors felt it necessary to address their reason for wanting to “change” their government. "…Whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends [unalienable rights], it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.” Note our founding fathers listed 2 options here regarding their consent to be governed; “…to alter or to abolish”. There was nothing that gave them hope as to being able to “alter” or reform government in a more amicable fashion with the British Empire. This was because they had no voice, no representation, nor any forum in which to address their grievances regarding their rights not only as British citizens, but as individuals. There was no longer any reason to consent to British government. So they chose to abolish or “change” their government to one of self-rule. That is not the case of our government. We are not without recourse. Yet. That will change if Obama has his way. Obama can’t afford reform, he must have change in order to accomplish his agenda. You see, Obama tries to sell us the idea that this is the state of our government today and that is why he is out to “reform” government when in fact he is out to “abolish” or “change” it simply because he does not like it. A better word for “change” is “destroy”. He claims that our rights as individuals have been taken from us by forces much bigger than ourselves, or in some cases never existed at all. But in actuality Obama believes the rights of the individual are only valid as they pertain to the common welfare of the whole. This is a valid argument when speaking of the necessity of moral law. But not the inalienable rights in our Constitution. If enterprise or merit puts one person or group over another it needs to be regulated or dismantled and replaced with something that keeps everyone “equal”. This is his whole argument behind his redistribution of wealth philosophy, a philosophy I refer to as a “reparation mentality”, nothing more than his own brand of racism and hatred. Unfortunately if this type of equality is embraced, there is no longer a need for anyone to strive to better themselves. Society will indeed become equal – equally ineffective and equally enslaved. Healthcare and Financial Institution “reform” is not reform but the destruction of a system (good though not perfect) to be replaced with another (proven historically to be neither good or perfect). Nationalism replaces free market, socialism replaces capitalism. To what end? The argument as to whether these “reforms” will be more effective and less expensive thereby more accessible to more is mute. The real argument is whether the change Obama proposes will enslave because eventually there will be no individual choice or merit allowed. Individual choice, free enterprise, open disagreement and right to personal wealth must be sacrificed. This is true regardless of how many times or how many ways he and his comrades try to convince us otherwise. Division rather than unity – In order to perpetrate Obama’s “change” toward socialism he must have an enemy that unites the masses. Though he claims to be a unifier it is obvious if you really listen to him, he is actually a divider, a hater who claims to be a lover. White, gun toting Bible pounders are out of touch elitists and racists, Republicans and conservatives are equally resistant to progressive change, desiring only to keep the poor and minorities in their place (with a personal vendetta to destroy Obama), the rich want to get richer at the expense of the poor, American government has too long bullied and occupied other nations rather than embrace everyone’s diversity and way of government. And corporate America is the enemy of all. The media is the avenue by which he creates his enemies and fights his battle. And make no mistake…it is about him and him alone. Take for example the latest from Marvel Comics. Not the Situation Room for sure but mainstream press just the same. From a recent article I pull this quote: “Issue 602 of the comic [Captain America] features Captain America investigating a right-wing anti-government militia group called "the Watchdogs". Hoping to infiltrate the group, Captain America and his African-American sidekick The Falcon observe an anti-tax protest from a rooftop. The protesters depicted are all white and carry signs adorned with slogans almost identical to those seen today in Tea Party rallies like, ‘Tea Bag Libs Before They Tea Bag You’ and ‘Stop The Socialists.’ The Falcon mentions that the gathering appears to be ‘some kind of anti-tax protest’ and notes that ‘this whole 'hate the government' vibe isn't limited to the Watchdogs.’ He then tells Captain America that he doesn't think their plan will work because ‘I don't exactly see a black man from Harlem fitting in with a bunch of angry white folks.’ " Accidental you say? Forgivable you claim? Perhaps. And the again perhaps not. In today’s political environment much more than any previous age the media brands, typecasts and passes judgment on any opposition to the liberal agenda in general, Obama’s agenda in particular. This is not by accident and not without reason. Today the media is more about gossip than news. And gossip begets judgment. Second, the media today is owned and run by the very same people who own and run Obama. The very same people Obama claims are the enemies of America, big, racist bent, powerful corporations. Not the type he speaks to us about. His are the crime syndicates and non-profits that dot our urban skylines throughout America. The question I asked mid-blog here was “To what end and for what reason would Obama want to destroy America?” Why does he continue to pursue his agenda in spite of the fact America is not only waking up from their stupor but noticing they are going somewhere they don’t recognize or want to go and are beginning to question him and in some places taking action to stop him? What makes this guy tick in the face of inevitable failure? In the movie, “The Dark Knight”, there is an exchange between Bruce Wayne and Alfred, his butler. Wayne is going through computer banks trying to piece together the motivation behind the Joker’s reign of terror. The exchange goes like this: WAYNE: “Criminals aren't complicated, Alfred. We just have to figure out what he's after.” ALFRED: “Respectfully, Master Wayne, perhaps this is a man you don't fully understand, either. I was in Burma. A long time ago. My friends and I were working for the local government. They were trying to buy the loyalty of tribal leaders, bribing them with precious stones. But their caravans were being raided in a forest north of Rangoon by a bandit. We were asked to take care of the problem, so we started looking for the stones. But after six months, we couldn't find anyone who had traded with him.” WAYNE: “What were you missing?” ALFRED: “One day I found a child playing with a ruby as big as a tangerine. The bandit had been throwing the stones away.” WAYNE: “So why was he stealing them?” ALFRED: “Because he thought it was good sport. Because some men aren't looking for anything logical, like money...they can't be bought, bullied, reasoned or negotiated with. Some men just want to watch the world burn.” The truth is that as bad as Obama is proving to be, as ineffective and corrupt Congress has become, in the end we are the ones responsible, we the citizens of this Republic, because we are the ones who put them there. We put them there because we didn’t want to be bothered with protecting our liberty. We were more concerned with protecting our own little worlds. What we forget is there are those who are willing to take whatever they can without thought of conscious, prudence or gratitude to those who have given it to them. There are those who just want to watch the world burn. In light of Obama’s arrogant unwillingness to represent those who elected him it makes one think, doesn’t it? |
|
They’ve Come A Long Way, Baby!
Originally Posted June 24, 2009 I was going to forgo mentioning anything about Heath Ledger’s win at the Oscar’s primarily because so many liberals just simply missed my point about why I knew he would win. I had grown tired of trying to reason with the rationally challenged. That reason of course (conservatives understand this) was because he died in the same year he made a movie, thus giving the Academy drawing power by appeasing the low self-esteem of its Board and Members while placating the movie goers by giving them a false sense that, yes, we of the high standing Academy and you of the lowly masses recognize and understand the importance of the work of one of our own, and the tragedy that has taken too many of us because we never stayed in school long enough to learn how to read a prescription label. Oh yeah, let’s not forget the increased advertising revenue for the Academy and stations. Most wanted to argue that his performance was indeed Oscar worthy and quoted statement’s like the one from Michael Caine in 2007 when he said Mr. Ledger was worthy of Oscar while he was still alive. Of course we all know his statement had NOTHING to do with the fact Mr. Caine was also in the movie and COULD NOT HAVE BEEN promoting the movie by building up a Co-Star in order to look humble but sell the movie at the same time, thus moving Mr. Caine ever so closer to a life time achievement award. I’m sure when that happens (I do believe he deserves one as he is a great actor) his comments about Mr. Ledger will be part of the collage of scenes and clips we will all be subjected to watch. So I was happy that at least I had predicted he had won and was willing to let it go at that. But then a strange thing occurred. After the Oscars no one talked about Heath anymore. Sure there was the gratuity piece on Good Morning America about Heath’s family accepting the awards on his behalf (wonder who paid the airfare). But all the buzz was about Sean Penn winning Best Actor for portraying Harvey Milk, some 2 bit camera store owner whose decision to campaign for a place on San Francisco's 2 bit Board of Supervisors somehow came to be seen as a landmark event within the gay rights movement. Why was it landmark? Because he openly admitted he was gay, taking his place right next to Rosa Parks as a great civil rights pioneer. Being gay IS about civil rights isn’t it and NOT about being gay, right? Anyway, I was watching this part of the Oscar program (I usually don’t watch at all but I was so rooting for Kate Winslet in “The Reader” an absolutely outstanding movie in my opinion) and stayed after she accepted to see who would win the Best Actor. Here is an excerpt of Penn’s acceptance speech: “Thank you. Thank you... You commie, homo-loving sons-of-guns. I did not expect this, but I, and I want it to be very clear, that I do know how hard I make it to appreciate me often. But I am touched by the appreciation and I hoped for it enough that I did want to scribble down, so I had the names in case you were commie, homo-loving sons-of-guns…” Then it hit me! Heath Ledger had instantly been trumped by a 2 bit, second rate homosexual politician, and the 2 bit second rate actor that portrayed him. The echoes of acclaim we have been subject to about Heath as a consummate professional, a tender soul, a great father were suddenly irrelevant in the face of this revelation that Hollywood is indeed the breeding place of commie, homo loving sons of guns…and we couldn’t be prouder as the crusaders for the gay rights the right wing, narrow-minded, Christian rednecks so much hate and want to destroy. Then I thought to myself, ”Hey didn’t Heath also win an Oscar for playing a gay cowboy?” I checked and discovered that he was only nominated and lost to Philip Seymour Hoffman who won for playing Truman Capote, the mysterious but famous gay author of “Breakfast At Tiffany’s” and “Cold Blood”. And then, wait a minute! Let me check something else here. Ah, yes. Praise God for all you commie, homo loving sons of guns. It was 10 years ago this year when we witnessed Hillary Swank accepting the Oscar for “Boys Don’t Cry” a story based on the murder of a gender confused girl in Nebraska. I remember that speech going something like this: “Indeed we have come a long way…” affirming that indeed Hollywood was way ahead of the rest of us moral dweebs because they could now openly portray gay people and be lauded and even awarded for it. Now before you commie, homo loving sons of guns put a petition together to have me removed form the airways via “The Fairness Doctrine” as a service to other commie, homo loving sons of guns, hear me out. I personally could care less what Hollywood does or believes. My life does not revolve around the political opinions, actions and activism of people who spend their entire lives portraying people other than themselves as a form of therapy to build their self-esteem (remember Sally Field…”you like me…you really like me.”). Although I enjoy all types of movies, I have never bought into the illusion that these people are somehow more balanced, better educated and more in tune with what the world lacks and needs simply because they can act. Most of them never even finished school because when they were in school liberalism had not yet become the mainstay of the curriculum. I like movies but they don’t rock my world (well, maybe Kate Winslet). My point being it is great that Hollywood now openly admits it is a place where commie, homo loving sons of guns can find a home and be accepted for what they are and are not…as long as they continue to make money for those that run Hollywood. The movie “Milk” did make money didn’t it? I don’t know. I didn’t see it. Don’t know of anybody who did. Except maybe James Lipton who may have paid the $13 million the movie grossed just for the opportunity to interview Penn once again on his show, “Inside The Actor’s Studio”. $13 million. Isn’t that what Kate Winslet earns per movie? After being scolded by Jeff Spicoli (Sean’s character in “Fast Times At Ridgemont High”) that “…I need to reflect and anticipate my great shame and the shame in my grandchildren’s eyes”, I would like to suggest, in the spirit of tolerance and acceptance 2 new movie ideas that could be developed in Hollywood over the next 2 years. This would ensure gay themed movies run consecutively in order that the “commie, homo loving sons of guns” in Hollywood can appease their egos, build their self-defined intellect and inspire even greater humanistic endeavors to greater heights in the name of activism. “Here I Come…Ready Or Not” – Starring Jim Carrey as Gavin Newsome. Watch as a young Newsome rises through the ranks of San Francisco politics, a heterosexual millionaire winemaker entrepreneur who discovers he would rather be a popular homosexual politician. Appointed by Willie Brown as Traffic Commissioner in 1996, Gavin transforms parking lots and alleys into safe havens for the homeless and gays that live and hang out there. This inspires him to later become Mayor in order that he can spread the gospel of clean, safe parking lots everywhere in Northern California and then the nation. “As California goes…so does the rest of the nation.” Determined to see Proposition 8 overturned young Gavin uses his newly discovered talents as a now bi-sexual politician to convince every member of the California Supreme Court and Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger that California can only become “green” after it has become “gay”. “Barney Frank…Congressional Man Of Mystery” – I’m seeing Dustin Hoffman here as Barney Frank. Watch Congressman/Secret Agent Frank slide in and out of the political underworld (and beds) with apparent ease while at the same time withstanding the ridicule of the right wing conservative bastards that would keep him from heading the House Financial Services Committee. Using the threat of sexual harassment, discrimination and bathroom stall encounters to get the lending industry to fund homes for people who can’t afford them and of course gays everywhere that want to own a home and adopt children, Frank, along with Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and Chris Todd manufacture an economic meltdown 3 weeks before their man Barak Obama is due to lose an election. Making sure their secret plan remains undetected they initiate counter-intelligence that lays the blame for the meltdown on Republicans while in tangent going about silencing those who would dare to speak the truth and uncover their diabolical scheme. Of course using Dustin Hoffman as the main character would allow for us to fall in love with this awkward lisp speaking imp just like when he played “Dolly” another cross dressing character which got him an Oscar nod. So that is my contribution to the commie, homo-loving sons of guns in Hollywood. And you liberals thought us conservatives don’t get it. |
|
HOW TO UNDERMINE A REPUBLIC
Originally Posted May 22, 2009 I began a series of broadcasts last month on the topic called “How To Undermine A Republic” in hope that I could make a small contribution to the conservative revival I see taking place since the coronation of the messiah Barack Obama and his socialist cohorts. The thought was to video tape the series and post them on You Tube (for that is where the liberals hang out) and then on my website for conservatives that would want to take the time to relearn (or in some “moderate” cases) learn what real conservatism is. Unfortunately as is the case in most instances today, learning about the principals upon which our American heritage is established is not as entertaining as learning where Michelle Obama shops for tennis shoes. The response was less than inspiring, to say the least…especially with the You Tube crowd. If you view the top videos on this and other liberally owned and saturated mediums you will see that unless you can compete with gay beauty pageant judges, Jimmy Kimmel or the biggest celebrity since Elvis (you KNOW who I am talking about) it is difficult to get the message out effectively. And frankly most liberals are not insightful enough to say anything other than I’m an idiot…a confirmation to me I AM hitting the mark when someone stands long enough to let me aim. So upon reflection I thought a better idea would be to circulate this information in my monthly blogs (yes, I AM going to get this out monthly in spite of the many distractions associated with producing, writing and airing the broadcast) and that way it might be better disseminated and digested at your leisure. My hope is you take it and spread it as you would the gospel because frankly unless we take back our government we may soon find ourselves as Christians in exile preaching from an underground church. I don’t know about you but I am not excited about martyrdom given the fact that life is already difficult enough. So here goes. History records that when the Philadelphia Constitutional Convention of 1787 ended, a Mrs. Powel approached Benjamin Franklin and asked him, “Well, Doctor, what have we got, a Republic or a Monarchy?” Dr. Franklin quickly responded, “A Republic, if you can keep it.”Dr. Franklin was rather prophetic in that today, the Republic of the United States of America is in danger of being destroyed at the hands of those who seek to undermine its godly principles and charters. Under the deceitful guise of democracy, fueled by populist strategies, relative moral truth and unsequestered ambition we find the philosophy of liberalism, a belief system that has not only proven scriptural and historically to lead to some form of oppressive tyrannical monarchy much like the one Mrs. Powell feared the day she spoke with Dr. Benjamin Franklin, but the eventual demise of every government infrastructure that has employed it as their form of rule. I believe our forefathers would be greatly distressed at the turn of events that have occurred since Franklin Roosevelt usurped the constitutional check and balance system our forefathers labored so hard to create. As we watch our new President attempting to rewind and reenact Roosevelt’s plan at almost breathtaking speed surely Dr. Franklin would turn to someone and say, “I think they may have lost it.” Our Constitution and Bill of Rights were established on the premise that the human race is unique in that it was created by God and solely for God’s purpose. Unlike the animal kingdom that liberal activists seem to think is essential to our continued existence and the salvation of the universe we humans were given the task of glorifying God to the heavens and to be a “peculiar people” that would forever be in His presence and share in His glory. We were commanded by Him to “have dominion, subject and rule” (Genesis 1:28) over this world not be dominated, subjected and ruled by it. With this peculiarity as the central point and purpose of our existence we have also been endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights, promises of blessing for obedience and authority as well as the responsibility and accountability that accompany such an assignment. Liberalism preaches God has become outdated and not in step with the needs of today’s world. Therefore the liberal agenda as one that seeks to undermine God’s plan, purpose and replace it with their own agenda not unlike the one Satan employed in the Garden of Eden with Adam and Eve.There, Satan successfully deceived man into rebelling and thus separating himself from God by getting him to think there was a better way to exist aside from God, convincing both man and woman they could set up a Utopian society in which they would “…be like God.” (Genesis 3:5). His strategy has not changed. He continues to exert that same deceptive influence, only now through liberalism, a philosophy that promises a utopian society in which everyone lives a trouble free, self-fulfilling life where we all just get along. Rather than God’s Word being the central compass by which we are to govern, the liberal mindset is one of legalistic deconstructionism. Equality and opportunity have been redefined as a “level playing field,” where redistribution is the method by which everyone obtains their desires in spite of their lack of dedication to God, their lack of educational pursuit, their self-serving motivation and self-rationalizing desire to avoid any and all responsibility and accountability for their actions. After all, responsibility can’t be part of God’s plan if He is perfect because there is so much imperfection in the world. And if it is not God’s plan then it’s anybody’s guess whose plan it is. Many may be shocked to see what is happening today in America. But the truth is these things are as old a creation itself. As Solomon once said, “There is nothing new under the sun.” (Ecclesiastes 1:9)“The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of ‘liberalism’ they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” – Norman Thomas, 1948 Presidential Campaign Norman Thomas saw something probably only a few saw at that time. That being, that given the right propaganda Socialism could not only thrive in our Republic, it could someday rule.So how does one undermine a Republic? Like a Muslim terrorist working in a sleeping cell they patiently plan and then wait for the opportunities handed them by carelessness of those they oppose. There are 3 phases that must be accomplished in order to undermine a Republic. I will cover the first one here and the last two in next month’s blog. 1) Correct Current Behavior of Individual 2) Corrupt Current System To Justify Behavior Correction 3) Indoctrinate Youth. Correct Current Behavior of Individual – Correcting the current behavior of the individual is paramount to undermining a Republic, for the very foundation of a Republic is holding in high esteem the value and worth of the individual. Liberals either deceitfully or unknowingly (depending on whether you are the deceived or the deceiver) claim they hold the individual in the high regard but the truth is their perception of the value of each human being is only as good as their contribution to the whole, masking the real belief each individual should surrender their identity for the common good. Individual achievement for one’s self alone is considered counter to what is morally right.Today we know this behavioral correction as “political correctness” which demands we tolerate everyone’s beliefs and opinions even if they are counter productive or even destructive to our core principles and values. Rather than requiring those who wish to pursue the benefits we have as American citizens to assimilate into our society, today’s liberal calls for us to assimilate their beliefs into our way of thinking.The thing that has always fascinated me about political correctness is that it is always initiated by a small minority, who influence and wear down the majority. Liberal activism is the usual instrument implemented for political correctness. I think of liberal activism as a child throwing a temper tantrum when they don’t get what they want. They scream, kick and holler until eventually the reason that the adult holds just succumbs in order to get rid of the noise and bother.But when we adults give in to the bratty child, the relief is only temporary. The child learns he/she is in control as long as they throw a fit when they want something. The child develops no true value system or moral compass because tolerance for bad behavior teaches everything is acceptable if you scream loud enough. There is nothing by which to measure right and wrong, productive and counter-productive, constructive and destructive. Such is the liberal mindset today. Everything is gauged by feelings and desires by both the adult and child with no thought of long term consequences.That is how I see liberal leadership and activism in today, as either adults who can or will no longer control the child or a child that will not be controlled. It consists of both adults and children who need correction but the adults do not want to be held responsible for their lack of action toward the child nor do they want to be responsible for the actions of the child. Which brings us to the second element of behavior correction: Spinning Correction As Compassionate Sacrifice – The second element of behavior correction requires the correction be painted as sacrifice rather than subjection. Going back to our our unruly child, the problem is that some individuals don’t like to be around them and may even voice this displeasure to the parent of the child. But instead of acting like responsible adults by taking their child aside and saying, “Enough is enough…go to your room until you can act like right”, they make excuses for the child, wrongfully expecting everyone to accept the child’s behavior out of compassion for the child. It’s not the child’s fault they are not responsible. And it’s not the adult’s fault because after all, don’t children, as human beings have the same rights as adults?But then one day the child grows up and becomes not only unruly, but also an undisciplined, high maintenance individual. And everyone looks, shakes their head and says, “Someone needed to discipline that child.” By then it is too late. The child turned adult becomes the victim and the victim is always miserable, making everyone else miserable in the process. To avoid criticism and taking any responsibility for the child’s behavior, the adult begins to propagandize by trying to make those who disapprove of the child’s behavior guilty about questioning the child’s actions. |
